Safari All comparisons
DIVE vs Locofy
DIVE vs Locofy
Locofy generates code from Figma. DIVE emits diffs from the live page.
Same comparison shape as Builder.io: Figma-first generation vs live-page-first iteration. Different starting points, different fits.
Pick DIVE when
- You iterate on an existing deployed product.
- You want diffs your AI agent applies into existing code.
Pick Locofy when
- You design in Figma and need first-pass code output.
| Feature | DIVE | Locofy |
|---|---|---|
| Visual editing on a scriptable webpage | Yes, typography, colour, layout, spacing, motion and effects on localhost, staging or production pages the extension can script. Browser-protected pages are excluded. | Figma → code generation |
| MCP (Model Context Protocol) handoff to AI agents | Yes, Cloud, Local, and Self-hosted modes; eight common session tools, plus Local feedback rounds | Figma plugin |
| Persistent change history (Changes tab) | Yes, searchable, filterable, exportable | Per-Figma file |
| Open source | Yes (MIT) | Proprietary |
| Price | Free MIT-licensed extension | Paid tiers |
| Markdown / JSON export of the diff | Yes | Generated component code |
| Best fit for | Designers, developers, QA, PMs, content, indie hackers, agencies, vibe coders | Figma-first teams |
The honest take
Both can coexist, Locofy for the first-pass component, DIVE for the production-tuning loop.